Latino News and Opinion

1,200 Troops to the Border: Shameful!
Por AL DÍA NEWS   
10:07 | 05/28/10
-

To “identify, disrupt, and dismantle criminal organizations;” who could possibly object to that?

The description of such a lofty mission is meant to be the actual role of the “Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel on the Southwest Border today” according to General James L. Jones the National Security Advisor to President Obama.

Versión en español

“Identificar, interrumpir y desmantelar organizaciones criminales” ¿Quién acaso quisiera oponerse a ello?

“Rather than seeking to deploy an arbitrary number of National Guard personnel” Obama’s National Security Advisor extolled the “unprecedented resources” dedicated by the administration to border protection and law enforcement.

After protesting Congress’ “unwarranted interference with the Commander-in-Chief’s responsibilities to direct the employment of our Armed Forces” General Jones warned it would even compromise the ability to “bear the burden of our Nation for fighting two wars.”

In a final attempt to ally the south border menace hysteria, the top National Security Advisor claimed some successes such as “significant seizures of illegal drugs…record seizures of illegal weapons and bulk cash”.   Interestingly enough, the General provided no actual figures, and for a very good reason.

When President George W. Bush deployed a maximum 6,000 troops between 2006 and 2008 the kudos during their mission were an annual average of 54,000 “illegal” immigrants arrested, the seizure of $23,000 in cash and 102 metric tons of illicit drugs.

Those figures pale into insignificance when compared against the actual magnitude of the drug and weapons trade and money laundering.  The U.S. consumes 1,735 metric tons of drugs, 17 times more than what was seized, including in order of tonnage: marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.

The drug trade alone generates $36 billion a year, money that freely surfs in and out of the U.S.’ financial system, and the troop surge in 3 years seized $69,000?

Politicians have a knack of astutely invoking grandiose goals such as the “fighting and dismantling” of criminal organizations.  Then they astutely claim vague successes such as “significant” or “record” seizures of drugs and money, and we inevitably have to ask, whom are they so brazenly trying to deceive?

The sole objective of “securing our borders” is to keep brown people out. 

Neither President Barack Obama or his predecessor George W. Bush, actually combat America’s addition to drugs, and its penchant for selling powerful weapons to criminal organizations, all in the name of its infatuation with money.

Right now the American public and the politicians that court it are far more concerned with the feigned menace of immigration.

 

2 Comentarios
Votos: -1
...
Escrito por wiselatina2theright, mayo 29, 2010
"The sole objective of “securing our borders” is to keep brown people out." That statement is shameful. What's even more shameful is that the author would prefer to continue to allow criminal human trafficking organizations who victimize illegal aliens in unspeakable ways including warehousing them in drop houses until fees are paid to release them. The bottom line is that the open borders lobby of the left want the status quo, that is, no enforcement of any of our immigration laws whether it be directed at stopping illegal aliens at the border, identifying illegal alien criminals in our jails, cracking down on employers of illegals, requiring verification of work authorization, or arresting illegals themselves. The left doesn't want any thing to impede an illegal alien's ability to live, work, and commit crimes in this nation. Now that is shameful.
Reportar abuso
Votos: -1
Why we need effective, secure borders NOW!
Escrito por wiselatina2theright, mayo 29, 2010
Reportar abuso
Su opinión es importante. Escríbala aquí.

Decálogo del comentarista responsable de pontealdia.com

El derecho constitucional nuestro y de nuestros lectores a la libre expresión es irrenunciable. No obstante, son inadmisibles los comentarios que contengan:

1. Lenguaje vulgar, obsceno u ofensivo 6. Retórica de odio
2. Ataques personales 7. Comentarios racistas, sexistas o contra minoría
3. Mensajes que inciten a la violencia 8. Publicidad
4. Textos amenazantes 9. Basura
5. Acusaciones sin fundamento (calumnias) 10. Gritos (SOLO MAYÚSCULAS)

busy
 
pontealdia.com en facebookpontealdia.com en twitter
Viva Mexico